form10q.htm
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
T
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.
OR
£
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from ________ to ________.
COMMISSION
FILE NUMBER 0-14703
NBT
BANCORP INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE
|
16-1268674
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
52
SOUTH BROAD STREET, NORWICH, NEW YORK 13815
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's
Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (607) 337-2265
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for shorter periods that the Registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes T No £
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer T Accelerated
filer £ Non-accelerated
filer £ Smaller
reporting company £
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes £ No T
As of
April 30, 2008, there were 32,088,770 shares outstanding of the Registrant's
common stock, $0.01 par value.
FORM 10-Q--Quarter Ended March
31, 2008
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item
1
|
Interim
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2
|
|
|
|
Item
3
|
|
|
|
Item
4
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item
1
|
|
Item
1A
|
|
Item
2
|
|
Item
3
|
|
Item
4
|
|
Item
5
|
|
Item
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NBT
Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and due from banks
|
|
$ |
129,630 |
|
|
$ |
155,495 |
|
|
$ |
132,494 |
|
Short-term
interest bearing accounts
|
|
|
7,345 |
|
|
|
7,451 |
|
|
|
24,598 |
|
Securities
available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
1,127,707 |
|
|
|
1,132,230 |
|
|
|
1,107,624 |
|
Securities
held to maturity (fair value $158,482, $149,519, and
$145,762)
|
|
|
157,353 |
|
|
|
149,111 |
|
|
|
145,760 |
|
Federal
Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
41,353 |
|
|
|
38,102 |
|
|
|
30,487 |
|
Loans
and leases
|
|
|
3,505,453 |
|
|
|
3,455,851 |
|
|
|
3,395,476 |
|
Less
allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
56,500 |
|
|
|
54,183 |
|
|
|
50,554 |
|
Net
loans and leases
|
|
|
3,448,953 |
|
|
|
3,401,668 |
|
|
|
3,344,922 |
|
Premises
and equipment, net
|
|
|
64,302 |
|
|
|
64,042 |
|
|
|
65,784 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
103,398 |
|
|
|
103,398 |
|
|
|
103,420 |
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
9,782 |
|
|
|
10,173 |
|
|
|
11,408 |
|
Bank
owned life insurance
|
|
|
44,066 |
|
|
|
43,614 |
|
|
|
42,217 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
95,882 |
|
|
|
96,492 |
|
|
|
92,067 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
5,229,771 |
|
|
$ |
5,201,776 |
|
|
$ |
5,100,781 |
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
(noninterest bearing)
|
|
$ |
672,616 |
|
|
$ |
666,698 |
|
|
$ |
624,171 |
|
Savings,
NOW, and money market
|
|
|
1,656,374 |
|
|
|
1,614,289 |
|
|
|
1,632,222 |
|
Time
|
|
|
1,525,236 |
|
|
|
1,591,106 |
|
|
|
1,710,262 |
|
Total
deposits
|
|
|
3,854,226 |
|
|
|
3,872,093 |
|
|
|
3,966,655 |
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
399,992 |
|
|
|
368,467 |
|
|
|
204,421 |
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
424,858 |
|
|
|
424,887 |
|
|
|
392,792 |
|
Trust
preferred debentures
|
|
|
75,422 |
|
|
|
75,422 |
|
|
|
75,422 |
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
69,410 |
|
|
|
63,607 |
|
|
|
53,911 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
4,823,908 |
|
|
|
4,804,476 |
|
|
|
4,693,201 |
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 2,500,000 shares at March 31, 2008,
December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares at March 31, 2008,
December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007; issued 36,459,397, 36,459,421, and
36,459,481 at March 31, 2008, December 31, 2007, and March 31, 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
273,929 |
|
|
|
273,275 |
|
|
|
272,026 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
220,709 |
|
|
|
215,031 |
|
|
|
198,948 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
(3,575 |
) |
|
|
(11,724 |
) |
Common
stock in treasury, at cost, 4,385,423, 4,133,328, and 2,463,124 shares at
March 31, 2008, December 31, 2007, and March 31, 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
(93,351 |
) |
|
|
(87,796 |
) |
|
|
(52,035 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
405,863 |
|
|
|
397,300 |
|
|
|
407,580 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
5,229,771 |
|
|
$ |
5,201,776 |
|
|
$ |
5,100,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NBT
Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
(unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest,
fee, and dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and fees on loans and leases
|
|
$ |
58,617 |
|
|
$ |
59,808 |
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
|
13,746 |
|
|
|
13,467 |
|
Securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
Other
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Total
interest, fee, and dividend income
|
|
|
74,652 |
|
|
|
75,459 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
25,984 |
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
4,302 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
Trust
preferred debentures
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
Total
interest expense
|
|
|
30,587 |
|
|
|
34,830 |
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
44,065 |
|
|
|
40,629 |
|
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
37,587 |
|
|
|
38,533 |
|
Noninterest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
Broker/
dealer and insurance revenue
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
Trust
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
Net
securities gains (losses)
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Bank
owned life insurance
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
ATM
fees
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
1,896 |
|
Retirement
plan administration fees
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
Total
noninterest income
|
|
|
16,095 |
|
|
|
12,690 |
|
Noninterest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
|
|
16,770 |
|
|
|
15,964 |
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
Data
processing and communications
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
2,877 |
|
Professional
fees and outside services
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
Office
supplies and postage
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Loan
collection and other real estate owned
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
Total
noninterest expense
|
|
|
34,034 |
|
|
|
30,872 |
|
Income
before income tax expense
|
|
|
19,648 |
|
|
|
20,351 |
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
5,932 |
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
13,716 |
|
|
$ |
14,132 |
|
Earnings
per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
NBT
Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in-
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
271,528 |
|
|
$ |
191,770 |
|
|
$ |
(14,014 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,832 |
) |
|
$ |
403,817 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,132 |
|
Cash
dividends - $0.19 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,531 |
) |
Purchase
of 373,967 treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,562 |
) |
|
|
(8,562 |
) |
Net
issuance of 89,862 shares to employee
benefit plans and other stock plans, including tax
benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
Grant
of 24,530 shares of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
272,026 |
|
|
$ |
198,948 |
|
|
$ |
(11,724 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,035 |
) |
|
$ |
407,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
273,275 |
|
|
$ |
215,031 |
|
|
$ |
(3,575 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,796 |
) |
|
$ |
397,300 |
|
Cumulative
effect adjustment to record liability for split-dollar life insurance
policies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,518 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,716 |
|
Cash
dividends - $0.20 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,416 |
) |
Purchase
of 272,840 treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,939 |
) |
|
|
(5,939 |
) |
Net
issuance of 29,193 shares to employee
benefit plans and other stock plans, including tax
benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599 |
|
Net
forfeiture of 8,448 shares of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,786 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
273,929 |
|
|
$ |
220,709 |
|
|
$ |
4,211 |
|
|
$ |
(93,351 |
) |
|
$ |
405,863 |
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements
|
|
NBT
Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
13,716 |
|
|
$ |
14,132 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization of premises and equipment
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
Net
accretion on securities
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
Bank
owned life insurance income
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(434 |
) |
Proceeds
from sales of loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
5,389 |
|
Originations
and purchases of loans held for sale
|
|
|
(3,392 |
) |
|
|
(7,948 |
) |
Net
gains on sales of loans held for sale
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Net
security (gains) losses
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Net
gain on sales of other real estate owned
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Net
decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
(2,135 |
) |
Net
(decrease) increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
|
|
3,590 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
21,981 |
|
|
|
17,227 |
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from maturities, calls, and principal paydowns
|
|
|
167,340 |
|
|
|
56,182 |
|
Proceeds
from sales
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
10,553 |
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(150,614 |
) |
|
|
(72,795 |
) |
Securities
held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from maturities, calls, and principal paydowns
|
|
|
10,876 |
|
|
|
8,094 |
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(19,149 |
) |
|
|
(17,581 |
) |
Net
(increase) decrease in loans
|
|
|
(54,621 |
) |
|
|
17,313 |
|
Net
(increase) decrease in Federal Reserve and FHLB stock
|
|
|
(3,251 |
) |
|
|
8,325 |
|
Purchases
of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
(1,548 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
Proceeds
from sales of other real estate owned
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(49,561 |
) |
|
|
10,076 |
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
|
(17,867 |
) |
|
|
170,417 |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
31,525 |
|
|
|
(140,987 |
) |
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Repayments
of long-term debt
|
|
|
(50,029 |
) |
|
|
(74,936 |
) |
Excess
tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
Proceeds
from the issuance of shares to employee benefit plans and other stock
plans
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
(5,939 |
) |
|
|
(8,562 |
) |
Cash
dividends and payment for fractional shares
|
|
|
(6,416 |
) |
|
|
(6,531 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
(9,004 |
) |
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(25,971 |
) |
|
|
18,299 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
162,946 |
|
|
|
138,793 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
136,975 |
|
|
$ |
157,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
Cash paid during the period
for:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
32,585 |
|
|
$ |
33,783 |
|
Income
taxes paid (refund received)
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Noncash investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
transferred to OREO
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
13,716 |
|
|
$ |
14,132 |
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
net holding gains arising during the year (pre-tax amounts of $13,368 and
$3,806)
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
Less
reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses related to securities
available for sale included in net income (pre-tax amounts of ($15) and
$5)
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Amortization
of prior service cost and actuarial gains (pre-tax amounts of $90 and
$90)
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Total
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
7,786 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
$ |
21,502 |
|
|
$ |
16,422 |
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements
|
|
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
Note
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
NBT
Bancorp Inc. (the Registrant) is a registered financial holding company
incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1986, with its principal headquarters
located in Norwich, New York. The Company is the parent holding company of NBT
Bank, N.A. (the Bank), NBT Financial Services, Inc. (NBT Financial), Hathaway
Agency, Inc., CNBF Capital Trust I, NBT Statutory Trust I and NBT Statutory
Trust II. Through these subsidiaries, the Company operates as one
segment focused on community banking operations. The Company’s primary business
consists of providing commercial banking and financial services to its customers
in its market area. The principal assets of the Company are all of the
outstanding shares of common stock of its direct subsidiaries, and its principal
sources of revenue are the management fees and dividends it receives from the
Bank and NBT Financial.
The Bank
is a full service commercial bank formed in 1856, which provides a broad range
of financial products to individuals, corporations and municipalities throughout
the central and upstate New York and northeastern Pennsylvania market
area.
Note
2.
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of NBT Bancorp Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, NBT Bank, N.A.,
NBT Financial Services, Inc., and Hathaway Agency, Inc. Collectively,
the Registrant and its subsidiaries are referred to herein as “the
Company.” All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. Amounts in the prior period financial statements are reclassified
whenever necessary to conform to current period presentation.
Note
3.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued revised
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, "Business
Combinations." SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements
of SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (formerly the purchase
method) be used for all business combinations; that an acquirer be identified
for each business combination; and that intangible assets be identified and
recognized separately from goodwill. SFAS No. 141(R) requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the
acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited
exceptions. Additionally, SFAS No. 141(R) changes the requirements
for recognizing assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from
contingencies and recognizing and measuring contingent
consideration. SFAS No. 141(R) also enhances the disclosure
requirements for business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and may not be applied before that date. The impact
that SFAS No. 141 is expected to have on our financial condition or results of
operations is indeterminable as it is prospective in nature.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51," or SFAS No. 160.
SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial
Statements" to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Among other things, SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the
consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated
financial statements and requires consolidated net income to be reported at
amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the
noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 also amends SFAS No. 128,
"Earnings per Share," so that earnings per share calculations in consolidated
financial statements will continue to be based on amounts attributable to the
parent. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and
is applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is
initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which
are to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. SFAS No. 160 is not
expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities,” or SFAS No. 161. The new standard is
intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging
activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better
understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. The new standard also improves transparency about
the location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entity’s financial
statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under Statement 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities”; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect its
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No.
161 achieves these improvements by requiring disclosure of the fair values of
derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. It also
provides more information about an entity’s liquidity by requiring disclosure of
derivative features that are credit risk–related. Finally, it requires
cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate
important information about derivative instruments. It is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS No.
161 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Preparing
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period, as well as the disclosures provided. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Estimates associated with the allowance for loan losses,
pension expense, fair values of financial instruments and status of
contingencies are particularly susceptible to material change in the near
term.
The
allowance for loan and lease losses is the amount which, in the opinion of
management, is necessary to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan and
lease portfolio. The allowance is determined based upon numerous considerations,
including local economic conditions, the growth and composition of the loan
portfolio with respect to the mix between the various types of loans and their
related risk characteristics, a review of the value of collateral supporting the
loans, comprehensive reviews of the loan portfolio by the independent loan
review staff and management, as well as consideration of volume and trends of
delinquencies, nonperforming loans, and loan charge-offs. As a result of the
test of adequacy, required additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses
are made periodically by charges to the provision for loan and lease
losses.
The
allowance for loan and lease losses related to impaired loans is based on
discounted cash flows using the loan’s initial effective interest rate or the
fair value of the collateral for certain loans where repayment of the loan is
expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral (collateral
dependent loans). The Company’s impaired loans are generally collateral
dependent. The Company considers the estimated cost to sell, on a discounted
basis, when determining the fair value of collateral in the measurement of
impairment if those costs are expected to reduce the cash flows available to
repay or otherwise satisfy the loans.
Management
believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate. While
management uses available information to recognize loan and lease losses, future
additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses may be necessary based on
changes in economic conditions or changes in the values of properties securing
loans in the process of foreclosure. In addition, various regulatory agencies,
as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the
Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses. Such agencies may require the
Company to recognize additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses based
on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their
examination which may not be currently available to management.
Other
real estate owned (“OREO”) consists of properties acquired through foreclosure
or by acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. These assets are recorded at
the lower of fair value of the asset acquired less estimated costs to sell or
“cost” (defined as the fair value at initial foreclosure). At the time of
foreclosure, or when foreclosure occurs in-substance, the excess, if any, of the
loan over the fair value of the assets received, less estimated selling costs,
is charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses and any subsequent
valuation write-downs are charged to other expense. Operating costs associated
with the properties are charged to expense as incurred. Gains on the sale of
OREO are included in income when title has passed and the sale has met the
minimum down payment requirements prescribed by GAAP.
Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. The Company files
consolidated tax returns on the accrual basis. Deferred income taxes are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income or the existence of sufficient taxable income within the
available carryback period. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more
likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized. Based on available evidence, gross deferred tax assets will ultimately
be realized and a valuation allowance was not deemed necessary at March 31, 2008
and 2007, or December 31, 2007. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.
Note
5.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The
Company is a party to financial instruments in the normal course of business to
meet financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to
fluctuating interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to
extend credit, unused lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. Exposure
to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to make loans and standby letters of credit
is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses
the same credit policy to make such commitments as it uses for on-balance-sheet
items. Commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit totaled $666.5
million at March 31, 2008 and $654.0 million at December 31,
2007. Since commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit
may expire without being fully drawn upon, this amount does not necessarily
represent future cash commitments. Collateral obtained upon exercise of the
commitment is determined using management’s credit evaluation of the borrower
and may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, land and other
items.
The
Company guarantees the obligations or performance of customers by issuing
stand-by letters of credit to third parties. These stand-by letters of credit
are frequently issued in support of third party debt, such as corporate debt
issuances, industrial revenue bonds and municipal securities. The risk involved
in issuing stand-by letters of credit is essentially the same as the credit risk
involved in extending loan facilities to customers, and they are subject to the
same credit origination, portfolio maintenance and management procedures in
effect to monitor other credit and off-balance sheet products. Typically, these
instruments have terms of five years or less and expire unused; therefore, the
total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Standby
letters of credit totaled $26.5 million at March 31, 2008, $27.5 million at
December 31, 2007, and $27.9 million at March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2008,
the fair value of standby letters of credit was not significant to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Note
6.
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
Basic
earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock
were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of
common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity (such as the
Company’s dilutive stock options).
The
following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
periods presented in the consolidated statements of income.
Three months ended March
31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
32,054 |
|
|
|
34,176 |
|
Net income available to common
shareholders
|
|
|
13,716 |
|
|
|
14,132 |
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
32,054 |
|
|
|
34,176 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock options and
restricted stock
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
Weighted
average common shares and common share equivalents
|
|
|
32,251 |
|
|
|
34,457 |
|
Net income available to common
shareholders
|
|
|
13,716 |
|
|
|
14,132 |
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
There
were 1,215,439 stock options for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and 272,565
stock options for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 that were not considered in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share since the stock options’ exercise
price was greater than the average market price during these
periods.
Note
7.
|
Defined
Benefit Postretirement Plans
|
The
Company has a qualified, noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan covering
substantially all of its employees at March 31, 2008. Benefits paid from the
plan are based on age, years of service, compensation, social security benefits,
and are determined in accordance with defined formulas. The Company’s policy is
to fund the pension plan in accordance with ERISA standards. Assets of the plan
are invested in publicly traded stocks and bonds. Prior to January 1, 2000, the
Company’s plan was a traditional defined benefit plan based on final average
compensation. On January 1, 2000, the plan was converted to a cash
balance plan with grandfathering provisions for existing
participants.
In
addition to the pension plan, the Company also provides supplemental employee
retirement plans to certain current and former executives. These
supplemental employee retirement plans and the defined benefit pension plan are
collectively referred to herein as “Pension Benefits.”
Also, the
Company provides certain health care benefits for retired
employees. Benefits are accrued over the employees’ active service
period. Only employees that were employed by NBT Bank on or before January 1,
2000 are eligible to receive postretirement health care benefits. The
plan is contributory for participating retirees, requiring participants to
absorb certain deductibles and coinsurance amounts with contributions adjusted
annually to reflect cost sharing provisions and benefit limitations called for
in the plan. Eligibility is contingent upon the direct transition
from active employment status to retirement without any break in employment from
NBT. Employees also must be participants in the Company’s medical
plan prior to their retirement. The Company funds the cost of
postretirement health care as benefits are paid. The Company elected to
recognize the transition obligation on a delayed basis over twenty
years. These postretirement benefits are referred to herein as “Other
Benefits.”
The
Components of pension expense and postretirement expense are set forth below (in
thousands):
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit
cost:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Service
Cost
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Interest
Cost
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
(1,343 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net amortization
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
The
Company is not required to make contributions to the Plan in
2008. The Company recorded approximately $54,000, net of tax, as
amortization of pension amounts previously recognized in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Note
8.
|
Trust
Preferred Debentures
|
CNBF
Capital Trust I is a Delaware statutory business trust formed in 1999, for the
purpose of issuing $18 million in trust preferred securities and lending the
proceeds to the Company. NBT Statutory Trust I is a Delaware statutory business
trust formed in 2005, for the purpose of issuing $5 million in trust preferred
securities and lending the proceeds to the Company. NBT Statutory Trust II is a
Delaware statutory business trust formed in 2006, for the purpose of issuing $50
million in trust preferred securities and lending the proceeds to the Company to
provide funding for the acquisition of CNB Bancorp, Inc. These three statutory
business trusts are collectively referred herein as “the Trusts.” The
Company guarantees, on a limited basis, payments of distributions on the trust
preferred securities and payments on redemption of the trust preferred
securities. The Trusts are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) for
which the Company is not the primary beneficiary, as defined in Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46 “Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin
No. 51 (Revised December 2003) (FIN 46R).” In accordance with FIN 46R, which was
implemented in the first quarter of 2004, the accounts of the Trusts are not
included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
As of
March 31, 2008, the Trusts had the following issues of trust preferred
debentures, all held by the Trusts, outstanding (dollars in
thousands):
Description
|
Issuance Date
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities
Outstanding
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Trust Preferred Debt Owed To
Trust
|
|
Final Maturity date
|
CNBF
Capital Trust I
|
August
1999
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
3-month
LIBOR plus 2.75%
|
|
$ |
18,720 |
|
August
2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NBT
Statutory Trust I
|
November
2005
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
6.30%
Fixed *
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
December
2035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NBT
Statutory Trust II
|
February
2006
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
6.195%
Fixed *
|
|
|
51,547 |
|
March
2036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Fixed for 5 years, converts to floating at 3-month LIBOR plus 140 basis
points (“bp”).
|
The
Company owns all of the common stock of the three business trusts, which have
issued trust preferred securities in conjunction with the Company issuing trust
preferred debentures to the Trusts. The terms of the trust preferred debentures
are substantially the same as the terms of the trust preferred securities. In
February 2005, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule that allows the
continued inclusion of trust preferred securities in the Tier 1 capital of bank
holding companies. The Board’s final rule limits the aggregate amount of
restricted core capital elements (which includes trust preferred securities,
among other things) that may be included in the Tier 1 capital of most bank
holding companies to 25% of all core capital elements, including restricted core
capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability.
Large, internationally active bank holding companies (as defined) are subject to
a 15% limitation. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of these
limits generally may be included in Tier 2 capital. The final rule provides a
five-year transition period, ending March 31, 2009, for application of the
quantitative limits. The Company does not expect that the quantitative limits
will preclude it from including the trust preferred securities in Tier 1
capital. However, the trust preferred securities could be redeemed without
penalty if they were no longer permitted to be included in Tier 1
capital.
Note
9.
|
Fair
Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
|
The
Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” , effective January 1,
2008. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price,
representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
Under SFAS No. 157, fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction
costs. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives
the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value
hierarchy under SFAS No. 157 are described below:
Basis of
Fair Value Measurement:
Level 1 -
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2
- - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability;
Level 3 -
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to
the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no
market activity).
A
financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The types
of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include
most U.S. government and agency securities, many other sovereign government
obligations, liquid mortgage products, active listed equities and most money
market securities. Such instruments are generally classified within level 1 or
level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As required by SFAS No. 157, the
Company does not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.
The types
of instruments valued based on quoted prices in markets that are not active,
broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable
levels of price transparency include most investment-grade and high-yield
corporate bonds, less liquid mortgage products, less liquid agency securities,
less liquid listed equities, state, municipal and provincial obligations, and
certain physical commodities. Such instruments are generally classified within
level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Level 3
is for positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to
transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or
non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available
market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate
will be used. Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external
support on certain Level 3 investments. Subsequent to inception, management only
changes level 3 inputs and assumptions when corroborated by evidence such as
transactions in similar instruments, completed or pending third-party
transactions in the underlying investment or comparable entities, subsequent
rounds of financing, recapitalizations and other transactions across the capital
structure, offerings in the equity or debt markets, and changes in financial
ratios or cash flows. Currently, the Company has no assets or
liabilities classified as Level 3.
In
accordance with FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157”, we have delayed the application of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial
assets, such as goodwill and real property held for sale, and nonfinancial
liabilities until January 1, 2009.
The
following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that
were accounted for at fair value. Assets and liabilities are
classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement (in thousands):
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Balance
as of March 31,
2008
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
Available for Sale
|
|
$ |
10,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,117,142 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,127,707 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,117,142 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,127,707 |
|
Fair
values for securities are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes, where
available. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair values
are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. When
necessary, the Company utilizes matrix pricing from a third party pricing vendor
to determine fair value pricing. Matrix prices are based on quoted
prices for securities with similar coupons, ratings, and maturities, rather than
on specific bids and offers for the designated security.
SFAS No.
157 requires disclosure of assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis. In accordance with the provisions of
Statement 114, the Company had impaired loans with a carrying value of
approximately $4.1 million that were written down to their fair value of
approximately $2.6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately
$1.5 million, which was included in earnings during the three month period ended
March 31, 2008. The Company uses the present value of expected future
cash flows, the fair value of collateral less the cost to sell, or the loan’s
observable market price to quantify the allowance for impaired
loans. Based on these valuation techniques, impaired loans are
classified as Level 3.
Simultaneously
with the adoption of SFAS No. 157, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, “The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, effective January
1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 gives entities the option to measure eligible
financial assets, financial liabilities and Company commitments at fair value
(i.e., the fair value option), on an instrument-by-instrument basis, that are
otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other accounting
standards. The election to use the fair value option is available
when an entity first recognizes a financial asset or financial liability or upon
entering into a Company commitment. Subsequent changes in fair value
must be recorded in earnings. Additionally, SFAS No. 159 allows for a
one-time election for existing positions upon adoption, with the transition
adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings. SFAS No. 159 also
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for
similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 does not affect
any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities
to be carried at fair value and does not eliminate disclosure requirements
included in other accounting standards. As of March 31, 2008, the
Company has not elected the fair value option for any eligible
items.
NBT BANCORP INC. and Subsidiaries
Item 2 -- MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
purpose of this discussion and analysis is to provide the reader with a concise
description of the financial condition and results of operations of NBT Bancorp
Inc. (Bancorp) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, NBT Bank, N.A. (the Bank), NBT
Financial Services, Inc. (NBT Financial), Hathaway Agency, Inc., CNBF Capital
Trust I, NBT Statutory Trust I and NBT Statutory Trust II (collectively referred
to herein as the Company). This discussion will focus on Results of Operations,
Financial Position, Capital Resources and Asset/Liability Management. Reference
should be made to the Company's consolidated financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in this Form 10-Q as well as to the Company's 2007 Form 10-K
for an understanding of the following discussion and analysis.
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this filing and future filings by the Company with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, in the Company’s press releases or other public or
shareholder communications, contain forward-looking statements, as defined in
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements may be identified
by the use of phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “forecasts,”
“projects,” or other similar terms. There are a number of
factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward looking
statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from
those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, among others, the
following: (1) competitive pressures among depository and other financial
institutions may increase significantly; (2) revenues may be lower than
expected; (3) changes in the interest rate environment may affect interest
margins; (4) general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, may
be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a
deterioration in credit quality and/or a reduced demand for credit; (5)
legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards or
tax laws, may adversely affect the businesses in which the Company is engaged;
(6) competitors may have greater financial resources and develop products that
enable such competitors to compete more successfully than the Company; (7)
adverse changes may occur in the securities markets or with respect to
inflation; (8) acts of war or terrorism; (9) the costs and effects of litigation
and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation; (10) internal control
failures; and (11) the Company’s success in managing the risks involved in the
foregoing.
The
Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made, and advises readers that
various factors, including those described above and other factors discussed in
the Company’s annual and quarterly reports previously filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, could affect the Company’s financial performance and
could cause the Company’s actual results or circumstances for future periods to
differ materially from those anticipated or projected.
Unless
required by law, the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any
obligations to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements
to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or
circumstances after the date of such statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management
of the Company considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance for
loan and lease losses to be a critical accounting policy given the uncertainty
in evaluating the level of the allowance required to cover credit losses
inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and the material effect that such
judgments can have on the results of operations. While management’s current
evaluation of the allowance for loan and lease losses indicates that the
allowance is adequate, under adversely different conditions or assumptions, the
allowance would need to be increased. For example, if historical loan and lease
loss experience significantly worsened or if current economic conditions
significantly deteriorated, additional provisions for loan and lease losses
would be required to increase the allowance. In addition, the assumptions and
estimates used in the internal reviews of the Company’s nonperforming loans and
potential problem loans has a significant impact on the overall analysis of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. While management has
concluded that the current evaluation of collateral values is reasonable under
the circumstances, if collateral evaluations were significantly lowered, the
Company’s allowance for loan and lease policy would also require additional
provisions for loan and lease losses.
Management
of the Company considers the accounting policy relating to pension accounting to
be a critical accounting policy. Management is required to make various
assumptions in valuing its pension assets and liabilities. These assumptions
include the expected rate of return on plan assets, the discount rate, and the
rate of increase in future compensation levels. Changes to these assumptions
could impact earnings in future periods. The Company takes into account the plan
asset mix, funding obligations, and expert opinions in determining the various
rates used to estimate pension expense. The Company also considers the Moody’s
AA and AAA corporate bond yields and other market interest rates in setting the
appropriate discount rate. In addition, the Company reviews expected
inflationary and merit increases to compensation in determining the rate of
increase in future compensation levels.
Overview
The
Company earned net income of $13.7 million ($0.43 diluted earnings per share)
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to net income of $14.1
million ($0.41 diluted earnings per share) for the three months ended March 31,
2007. The decrease in net income from 2007 to 2008 was primarily the result of
an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses totaling $4.4 million, as
well as an increase in noninterest expense of $3.2 million. The
increase in the provision for loan and lease losses for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 was due
primarily to an increase in net charge-offs in large part due to one large
commercial loan. The increase in noninterest expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007
was due primarily to increases in salaries and employee benefits, occupancy
expense, and professional fees and outside services. These increases
in the provision for loan and lease losses and noninterest expense were
partially offset by increases in net interest income and noninterest
income. Net interest income increased $3.4 million, or 8.5%, for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to March 31, 2007. This
increase was due primarily to a 49 bp decrease in the rate paid on interest
bearing liabilities. In addition, the Company also experienced a 1.7%
growth in average earning assets, which partially offset the 22 bp decrease in
the yield on interest earning assets from the three months ending March 31, 2007
to the three months ending March 31, 2008. Noninterest income
increased $3.4 million, or 26.8%, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in
noninterest income resulted primarily from increases in service charges on
deposit accounts, ATM and debit card fees, and other noninterest
income.
Table 1
depicts several annualized measurements of performance using GAAP net income.
Returns on average assets and equity measure how effectively an entity utilizes
its total resources and capital, respectively. Net interest margin, which is the
net federal taxable equivalent (FTE) interest income divided by average earning
assets, is a measure of an entity's ability to utilize its earning assets in
relation to the cost of funding. Interest income for tax-exempt securities and
loans is adjusted to a taxable equivalent basis using the statutory Federal
income tax rate of 35%.
Table
1 - Performance Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
2008
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Return
on average assets (ROAA)
|
|
|
1.07 |
% |
Return
on average equity (ROAE)
|
|
|
13.68 |
% |
Net
Interest Margin
|
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Return
on average assets (ROAA)
|
|
|
1.13 |
% |
Return
on average equity (ROAE)
|
|
|
14.06 |
% |
Net
Interest Margin
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
Net
Interest Income
Net
interest income is the difference between interest income on earning assets,
primarily loans and securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing
liabilities, primarily deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected
by the interest rate spread, the difference between the yield on earning assets
and cost of interest-bearing liabilities, as well as the volumes of such assets
and liabilities. Net
interest income is one of the major determining factors in a financial
institution’s performance as it is the principal source of earnings.
Table 2 represents an analysis of net interest income on a federal
taxable equivalent basis.
FTE net
interest income increased $3.6 million, or 8.5%, during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period of 2007. The increase in FTE net
interest income resulted primarily from a decrease in the yield on interest
bearing liabilities of 49 bp. The Company’s interest rate spread increased 27 bp
during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007. The yield on earning assets for the period decreased 22 bp, to
6.41% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from 6.63% for the same period
in 2007. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in average
interest earning assets, which increased $78.5 million, or 1.7%, for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007,
principally from growth in average loans and leases. Meanwhile, the
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased 49 bp, to 3.05% for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from 3.54% for the same period in
2007. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, total interest
income decreased $0.7 million, or 0.9%.
For the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, total interest expense decreased $4.2 million, or
12.2%, primarily the result of the 300 bp decrease in the Federal Funds target
rate since March 31, 2007, which impacts the Company’s short-term borrowing,
money market account and time deposit rates. Additionally, average
interest-bearing liabilities increased $44.3 million, or 1.1%, for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007,
principally from growth in short-term borrowings and long-term
debt. Total average interest-bearing deposits decreased $12.2
million, or 0.4%, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 when compared to the
same period in 2007. The rate paid on average interest-bearing
deposits decreased 43 bp from 3.25% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to
2.82% for the same period in 2008. For the quarter ended March 31,
2008, the Company experienced a shift in its deposit mix from savings and time
deposits to higher yielding money market deposit accounts. Savings and time
deposit accounts collectively decreased approximately $85.8 million, or 4.0%,
and money market accounts increased approximately $67.1 million, or
10.4%. NOW accounts remained relatively steady at $447.9 million at
March 31, 2008, as compared to $441.2 for the same period in 2007.
Total
average borrowings, including trust preferred debentures, increased $56.5
million, or 7.6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared with the
same period in 2007. Average short-term borrowings increased by $38.2
million, or 14.4%, from $265.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007
to $303.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Interest
expense from short-term borrowings decreased $0.8 million, or
24.3%. The rate paid on short-term borrowings decreased from 4.73%
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to 3.10% for the same period in
2008. Average long-term debt increased $18.3 million, or 4.5%, for
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared with the same period in
2007. The rate paid on long-term debt decreased to 4.07% for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared with 4.47% for the same period in
2007. As a result, interest paid on long-term debt decreased $0.2
million, or 4.1%, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the
same period in 2007.
Another
important performance measurement of net interest income is the net interest
margin. While the interest rate spread increased 27 bp from March 31,
2007 to March 31, 2008, the net interest margin increased by 21 bp to 3.84% for
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared with 3.63% for the same period
in 2007. The Company thus far has mitigated some of the margin pressure by
growing noninterest bearing demand deposit accounts. Average demand deposits
increased $42.5 million or 6.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
compared to the same period in 2007.
Table
2
Average
Balances and Net Interest Income
The
following tables include the condensed consolidated average balance sheet, an
analysis of interest income/expense and average yield/rate for each major
category of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities on a taxable
equivalent basis. Interest income for tax-exempt securities and loans has been
adjusted to a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory Federal income tax
rate of 35%.
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
interest bearing accounts
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
$ |
9,255 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
Securities
available for sale (2)
|
|
|
1,120,257 |
|
|
|
14,419 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
1,123,414 |
|
|
|
14,057 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
% |
Securities
held to maturity (2)
|
|
|
152,860 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
140,856 |
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
% |
Investment
in FRB and FHLB Banks
|
|
|
37,509 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
7.47 |
% |
|
|
34,804 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
% |
Loans
and leases (1)
|
|
|
3,466,360 |
|
|
|
58,830 |
|
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
3,398,590 |
|
|
|
60,001 |
|
|
|
7.16 |
% |
Total
interest earning assets
|
|
|
4,785,386 |
|
|
|
76,310 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
4,706,919 |
|
|
|
76,971 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
% |
Other
assets
|
|
|
378,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
5,164,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,068,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
market deposit accounts
|
|
$ |
709,962 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
$ |
642,907 |
|
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
NOW
deposit accounts
|
|
|
447,852 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
|
441,230 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
Savings
deposits
|
|
|
461,307 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
492,044 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
% |
Time
deposits
|
|
|
1,613,878 |
|
|
|
16,763 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
1,668,971 |
|
|
|
18,453 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
% |
Total
interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
3,232,999 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
3,245,152 |
|
|
|
25,984 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
303,576 |
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
265,347 |
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
Trust
preferred debentures
|
|
|
75,422 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
% |
|
|
75,422 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
% |
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
424,872 |
|
|
|
4,302 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
406,603 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
4,036,869 |
|
|
|
30,587 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
3,992,524 |
|
|
|
34,830 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
Demand
deposits
|
|
|
659,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
64,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
403,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
5,164,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,068,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income (FTE basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.09 |
% |
Net
interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
Taxable
equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Securities
are shown at average amortized
cost.
|
|
(2)
|
For
purposes of these computations, nonaccrual loans are included in the
average loan balances outstanding.
|
The
following table presents changes in interest income and interest expense
attributable to changes in volume (change in average balance multiplied by prior
year rate), changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior year volume),
and the net change in net interest income. The net change attributable to the
combined impact of volume and rate has been allocated to each in proportion to
the absolute dollar amounts of change.
Analysis
of Changes in Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Income
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008 over 2007
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
interest bearing accounts
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
Securities
available for sale
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
Investment
in FRB and FHLB Banks
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Loans and leases
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
Total interest income
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
market deposit accounts
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
NOW
deposit accounts
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Savings
deposits
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
Time
deposits
|
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
(1,690 |
) |
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
Trust
preferred debentures
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Long-term debt
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
Total interest expense
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
(5,012 |
) |
|
|
(4,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in FTE net interest
income
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
3,582 |
|
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income is a significant source of revenue for the Company and an important
factor in the Company’s results of operations. The following table
sets forth information by category of noninterest income for the years
indicated:
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust
|
|
$ |
1,774 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
ATM
fees
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
1,896 |
|
Broker/dealer
and insurance revenue
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
Net
securities gains (losses)
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Bank
owned life insurance
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
Retirement
plan administration fees
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$ |
16,095 |
|
|
$ |
12,690 |
|
Noninterest
income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $16.1 million, up $3.4
million or 26.8% from $12.7 million for the same period in 2007. The
increase in noninterest income was due primarily to an increase in fees from
service charges on deposit accounts and ATM and debit cards, which collectively
increased $2.3 million, or 35.5%, as the Company focused on enhancing fee income
through various initiatives. In addition, trust administration income
increased $0.3 million, or 23.5%, for the three month period ended March 31,
2008, compared with the same period in 2007. This increase stems
primarily from an increase in customer accounts resulting from successful
business development. Other noninterest income increased $0.6
million, or 35.5%, for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, compared
with the same period in 2007. This increase was due primarily to a
one-time $0.4 million gain from the mandatory redemption of Visa, Inc. common
stock associated with their initial public offering. Net securities
gains and losses for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 were
nominal and had no significant effect on noninterest income.
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expenses are also an important factor in the Company’s results of
operations. The following table sets forth the major components of
noninterest expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
|
$ |
16,770 |
|
|
$ |
15,964 |
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
Data
processing and communications
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
2,877 |
|
Professional
fees and outside services
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
Office
supplies and postage
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Loan
collection and other real estate owned
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$ |
34,034 |
|
|
$ |
30,872 |
|
Noninterest
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $34.0 million, up from
$30.9 million, or 10.2%, for the same period in 2007. Office expenses, such as
supplies and postage, occupancy, equipment and data processing and
communications charges were $9.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008, up $0.6 million, or 7.2%, from $9.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. This increase was due primarily to increased expenses
related to branch openings. Salaries and employee benefits increased
$0.8 million, or 5.0%, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared with
the same period in 2007 as the Company experienced a slight increase in the
number of full-time equivalent employees. Professional fees and
outside services increased $1.4 million, or 86.9%, for the three month period
ended March 31, 2008, compared with the same period in 2007, due primarily to
fees and costs related to the aforementioned noninterest income
initiatives.
Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2008 was $5.9 million,
down 4.6% from $6.2 million for the same period in 2007. The
effective rates were 30.2% and 30.6% for the three month periods ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, versus the same period in 2007,
resulted primarily from an increase in interest earned on tax exempt securities
in the first quarter of 2008.
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Loans and
Leases
A summary
of loans and leases, net of deferred fees and origination costs, by category for
the periods indicated follows:
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
Residential
real estate mortgages
|
|
$ |
731,336 |
|
|
$ |
719,182 |
|
|
$ |
738,336 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
624,904 |
|
|
|
621,820 |
|
|
|
637,828 |
|
Commercial
real estate mortgages
|
|
|
601,042 |
|
|
|
593,077 |
|
|
|
592,605 |
|
Real
estate construction and development
|
|
|
77,594 |
|
|
|
81,350 |
|
|
|
82,040 |
|
Agricultural
and agricultural real estate mortgages
|
|
|
111,204 |
|
|
|
116,190 |
|
|
|
119,399 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
691,122 |
|
|
|
655,375 |
|
|
|
598,758 |
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
580,096 |
|
|
|
582,731 |
|
|
|
541,352 |
|
Lease
financing
|
|
|
88,155 |
|
|
|
86,126 |
|
|
|
85,158 |
|
Total
loans and leases
|
|
$ |
3,505,453 |
|
|
$ |
3,455,851 |
|
|
$ |
3,395,476 |
|
Total
loans and leases were $3.5 billion, or 67.0% of assets, at March 31, 2008, $3.5
billion, or 66.4% of assets at December 31, 2007, and $3.4 billion, or 66.6%, at
March 31, 2007. Total loans and leases increased by $49.6 million or 1.4% from
December 31, 2007, and $110.0 million or 3.2% from March 31,
2007. These increases were due primarily to increases in consumer
loans, most notably indirect installment loans. Consumer loans
increased $35.7 million from December 31, 2007 and $92.4 million from March 31,
2007. In addition, home equity loans increased $38.7 million from
March 31, 2007 to March 31, 2008.
Securities
The
Company classifies its securities at date of purchase as available for sale,
held to maturity or trading. Held to maturity debt securities are
those that the Company has the ability and intent to hold until
maturity. Available for sale securities are recorded at fair
value. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax
effect, on available for sale securities are excluded from earnings and are
reported in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss. Held to maturity securities are
recorded at amortized cost. Trading securities are recorded at fair
value, with net unrealized gains and losses recognized currently in
income. Transfers of securities between categories are recorded at
fair value at the date of transfer. A decline in the fair value of
any available for sale or held to maturity security below cost that is deemed
other-than-temporary is charged to earnings resulting in the establishment of a
new cost basis for the security. Securities with an
other-than-temporary impairment are generally placed on nonaccrual
status.
Average
total earning securities increased $8.8 million, or 0.7%, for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007. The
average balance of securities available for sale decreased $3.2 million, or
0.3%, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 when compared to the same period
in 2007. The average balance of securities held to maturity increased
$12.0 million, or 8.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
the same period in 2007. The average total securities portfolio represents 26.6%
of total average earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2008, down
from 26.9% for the same period in 2007.
The
following details the composition of securities available for sale, securities
held to maturity and regulatory investments for the periods
indicated:
|
|
At
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
maturities 15 years or less
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
With
maturities greater than 15 years
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Collateral
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Municipal
securities
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
US
agency notes
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Allowance for Loan and Lease
Losses, Provision for Loan and Lease Losses, and Nonperforming
Assets
The
allowance for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level estimated by
management to provide adequately for risk of probable losses inherent in the
current loan and lease portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for
loan and lease losses is continuously monitored. It is assessed for adequacy
using a methodology designed to ensure the level of the allowance reasonably
reflects the loan portfolio’s risk profile. It is evaluated to ensure that it is
sufficient to absorb all reasonably estimable credit losses inherent in the
current loan and lease portfolio.
Management
considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan and lease
losses to be a critical accounting policy given the inherent uncertainty in
evaluating the levels of the allowance required to cover credit losses in the
portfolio and the material effect that such judgments can have on the
consolidated results of operations.
For
purposes of evaluating the adequacy of the allowance, the Company considers a
number of significant factors that affect the collectibility of the
portfolio. For individually analyzed loans, these include estimates
of loss exposure, which reflect the facts and circumstances that affect the
likelihood of repayment of such loans as of the evaluation date. For
homogeneous pools of loans and leases, estimates of the Company’s exposure to
credit loss reflect a thorough current assessment of a number of factors, which
could affect collectibility. These factors include: past loss experience; the
size, trend, composition, and nature of the loans and leases; changes in lending
policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and
collection, charge-off and recovery practices; trends experienced in
nonperforming and delinquent loans and leases; current economic conditions in
the Company’s market; portfolio concentrations that may affect loss experienced
across one or more components of the portfolio; the effect of external factors
such as competition, legal and regulatory requirements; and the experience,
ability, and depth of lending management and staff. In addition,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral component of their examination
process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan and lease
losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions
to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at
the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to
management.
After a
thorough consideration and validation of the factors discussed above, required
additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses are made periodically by
charges to the provision for loan and lease losses. These charges are
necessary to maintain the allowance at a level which management believes is
reasonably reflective of overall inherent risk of probable loss in the
portfolio. While management uses available information to recognize
losses on loans and leases, additions to the allowance may fluctuate from one
reporting period to another. These fluctuations are reflective of
changes in risk associated with portfolio content and/or changes in management’s
assessment of any or all of the determining factors discussed
above. The allowance for loan and lease losses to outstanding loans
and leases at March 31, 2008 was 1.61% compared with 1.57% at December 31, 2007,
and 1.49% at March 31, 2007. Management considers the allowance for
loan losses to be adequate based on evaluation and analysis of the loan
portfolio.
Table 4
reflects changes to the allowance for loan and lease losses for the periods
presented. The allowance is increased by provisions for losses charged to
operations and is reduced by net charge-offs. Charge-offs are made when the
ability to collect loan principal within a reasonable time is unlikely. Any
recoveries of previously charged-off loans are credited directly to the
allowance for loan and lease losses.
Table
4
|
|
Allowance For Loan and Lease
Losses
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
beginning of period
|
|
$ |
54,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,587 |
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
|
Chargeoffs
|
|
|
(5,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(3,573 |
) |
|
|
|
Net
chargeoffs
|
|
|
(4,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$ |
56,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,554 |
|
|
|
|
Composition of Net
Chargeoffs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
and agricultural
|
|
$ |
(2,451 |
) |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
|
33 |
% |
Real
estate mortgage
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
14 |
% |
Consumer
|
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
53 |
% |
Net
chargeoffs
|
|
$ |
(4,161 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,129 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
Annualized
net chargeoffs to average loans and
leases
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming
assets consist of nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still
accruing, restructured loans, OREO, and nonperforming securities. Loans are
generally placed on nonaccrual when principal or interest payments become ninety
days past due, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection.
Loans may also be placed on nonaccrual when circumstances indicate that the
borrower may be unable to meet the contractual principal or interest payments.
OREO represents property acquired through foreclosure and is valued at the lower
of the carrying amount or fair market value, less any estimated disposal costs.
Nonperforming securities include securities which management believes are
other-than-temporarily impaired, carried at their estimated fair value and are
not accruing interest.
Table
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Nonaccrual
loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
and agricultural loans and real estate
|
|
$ |
21,932 |
|
|
$ |
20,491 |
|
|
$ |
12,082 |
|
Real
estate mortgages
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
Troubled debt restructured
loans
|
|
|
3,387 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
29,864 |
|
|
|
29,697 |
|
|
|
16,294 |
|
Loans
90 days or more past due and still accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
and agricultural loans and real estate
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Real
estate mortgages
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
Total loans 90 days or more past due and still
accruing
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
Total
nonperforming loans
|
|
|
30,407 |
|
|
|
30,579 |
|
|
|
17,363 |
|
Other real estate owned
(OREO)
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
|
30,887 |
|
|
|
31,139 |
|
|
|
17,995 |
|
Total
nonperforming loans to total loans and leases
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
Total
nonperforming assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.60 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
Total
allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans
|
|
|
185.81 |
% |
|
|
177.19 |
% |
|
|
291.16 |
% |
Total
nonperforming assets were $30.9 million at March 31, 2008, $31.1 million at
December 31, 2007, and $18.0 million at March 31, 2007. Nonaccrual
loans were $29.9 million at March 31, 2008, as compared to $29.7 million at
December 31, 2007 and $16.3 million at March 31, 2007. The increase
in nonperforming assets from March 31, 2007 to March 31, 2008 is primarily due
to one owner-occupied commercial real estate relationship, as well as several
agricultural loans that became nonaccrual during the second quarter of
2007.
In
addition to the nonperforming loans discussed above, the Company has also
identified approximately $58.5 million in potential problem loans at March 31,
2008 as compared to $73.3 million at December 31, 2007 and $70.9 million at
March 31, 2007. Potential problem loans are loans that are currently
performing, but where known information about possible credit problems of the
borrowers causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such
borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may result
in disclosure of such loans as nonperforming at some time in the
future. At the Company, potential problem loans are typically loans
that are performing but are classified by the Company’s loan rating system as
“substandard.” At March 31, 2008, potential problem loans primarily
consisted of commercial real estate and commercial and agricultural
loans. Management cannot predict the extent to which economic
conditions may worsen or other factors which may impact borrowers and the
potential problem loans. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that
other loans will not become 90 days or more past due, be placed on nonaccrual,
become restructured, or require increased allowance coverage and provision for
loan losses.
Net
chargeoffs totaled $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, up
$2.1 million from the $2.1 million charged off during the same period in
2007. The provision for loan and lease losses totaled $6.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared with the $2.1 million
provided during the same period in 2007 due primarily to an increase in net
chargeoffs.
Deposits
Total
deposits were $3.9 billion at March 31, 2008, down $17.9 million, or 0.5%, from
year-end 2007, and down $112.4 million, or 2.8%, from the same period in the
prior year. The decrease in deposits compared with March 31, 2007,
was driven by a decrease in time deposits of $185.0 million, or
10.8%.
Total
average deposits for the three months ended March 31, 2008 increased $30.3
million, or 0.8%, from the same period in 2007. The Company experienced an
increase in average money market accounts of $67.1 million, or 10.4%, for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007. This increase in average money market accounts was primarily
due to a shift from savings accounts and time deposit accounts to higher
yielding money market accounts. Average NOW accounts increased
slightly, from $441.2 million at March 31, 2007 as compared with $447.9 million
at March 31, 2008, an increase of 1.5%. Average savings accounts
decreased $30.7 million, or 6.2%, for the three month period ending March 31,
2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was
primarily due to a shift from savings accounts to higher yielding money market
accounts. Average time deposits decreased $55.1 million, or 3.3%, for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 from the same period in
2007. This decrease was primarily due to a shift from time deposit
accounts to higher yielding money market accounts. Average demand
deposit accounts increased $42.5 million, or 6.9%, for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. This was due
primarily to an increasing customer base, as we expanded into new markets during
2007.
Borrowed
Funds
The
Company's borrowed funds consist of short-term borrowings and long-term debt.
Short-term borrowings totaled $400.0 million at March 31, 2008 compared to
$368.5 million and $204.4 million at December 31, and March 31, 2007,
respectively. Long-term debt was $424.9 million at March 31, 2008, and was
$424.9 and $392.8 million at December 31, and March 31, 2007,
respectively. For more information about the Company’s borrowing
capacity and liquidity position, see the section with the title caption of
“Liquidity Risk” on page 32 of this report.
Capital
Resources
Stockholders'
equity of $405.9 million represents 7.8% of total assets at March 31, 2008,
compared with $397.3 million, or 7.6% as of December 31, 2007, and $407.6
million, or 8.0% at March 31, 2007. Under previously disclosed stock
repurchase plans, the Company purchased 272,840 shares of its common stock
during the three month period ended March 31, 2008, for a total of $5.9 million
at an average price of $21.77 per share. At March 31, 2008, there
were 1,203,040 shares available for repurchase under previously announced
plans.
In
September 2006, the FASB ratified a consensus reached by the EITF on Issue No.
06-4, "Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects
of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements," which clarifies
the accounting for the recognition of a
liability and related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar life
insurance arrangements. The EITF concluded that for and endorsement
split-dollar life insurance arrangement, an employer should recognize a
liability for the actuarial present value of the future death benefit as of the
employee’s expected retirement date. The consensus became effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. As a result the
Company recorded a liability and a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained
earnings of approximately $1.5 million in the first quarter of
2008.
The Board
of Directors considers the Company's earnings position and earnings potential
when making dividend decisions. The Company does not have a target
dividend pay out ratio.
As the
capital ratios in Table 6 indicate, the Company remains “well
capitalized.” Capital measurements are significantly in excess of
regulatory minimum guidelines and meet the requirements to be considered well
capitalized for all periods presented. Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 capital and
Risk-based capital ratios have regulatory minimum guidelines of 3%, 4% and 8%
respectively, with requirements to be considered well capitalized of 5%, 6% and
10%, respectively.
Table 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Measurements
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Tier
1 leverage ratio
|
|
|
7.14 |
% |
Tier
1 capital ratio
|
|
|
9.71 |
% |
Total
risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
10.96 |
% |
Cash
dividends as a percentage of net income
|
|
|
46.78 |
% |
Per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Book
value
|
|
$ |
12.65 |
|
Tangible
book value
|
|
$ |
9.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
Tier
1 leverage ratio
|
|
|
7.60 |
% |
Tier
1 capital ratio
|
|
|
10.53 |
% |
Total
risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
11.78 |
% |
Cash
dividends as a percentage of net income
|
|
|
46.21 |
% |
Per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Book
value
|
|
$ |
11.99 |
|
Tangible
book value
|
|
$ |
8.61 |
|
The
accompanying Table 7 presents the high, low and closing sales price for the
common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market, and cash dividends declared
per share of common stock. The Company's price to book value ratio was 1.75 at
March 31, 2008 and 1.95 in the comparable period of the prior year. The
Company's price was 14.5 times trailing twelve months earnings at March 31,
2008, compared to 14.3 times for the same period last year.
Table
7
|
|
Quarterly
Common Stock and Dividend Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Dividends
|
|
Quarter Endings
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Close
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31
|
|
$ |
25.81 |
|
|
$ |
21.73 |
|
|
$ |
23.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.190 |
|
June
30
|
|
|
23.45 |
|
|
|
21.80 |
|
|
|
22.56 |
|
|
|
0.200 |
|
September
30
|
|
|
23.80 |
|
|
|
17.10 |
|
|
|
21.74 |
|
|
|
0.200 |
|
December 31
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
20.58 |
|
|
|
22.82 |
|
|
|
0.200 |
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31
|
|
$ |
23.65 |
|
|
$ |
17.95 |
|
|
$ |
22.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.200 |
|
On April
28, 2008, NBT Bancorp Inc. announced the declaration of a regular quarterly cash
dividend of $0.20 per share. The cash dividend will be paid on June
15, 2008 to stockholders of record as of June 1, 2008.
Liquidity
and Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
Market
Risk
Interest
rate risk is among the most significant market risk affecting the
Company. Other types of market risk, such as foreign currency
exchange rate risk and commodity price risk, do not arise in the normal course
of the Company’s business activities. Interest rate risk is defined
as an exposure to a movement in interest rates that could have an adverse effect
on the Company’s net interest income. Net interest income is
susceptible to interest rate risk to the degree that interest-bearing
liabilities mature or reprice on a different basis than earning
assets. When interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more
quickly than earning assets in a given period, a significant increase in market
rates of interest could adversely affect net interest
income. Similarly, when earning assets mature or reprice more quickly
than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could result in a
decrease in net interest income.
In an
attempt to manage the Company's exposure to changes in interest rates,
management monitors the Company’s interest rate risk. Management’s
Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”) meets monthly to review the Company’s
interest rate risk position and profitability, and to recommend strategies for
consideration by the Board of Directors. Management also reviews loan
and deposit pricing, and the Company’s securities portfolio, formulates
investment and funding strategies, and oversees the timing and implementation of
transactions to assure attainment of the Board’s objectives in the most
effective manner. Notwithstanding the Company’s interest rate risk management
activities, the potential for changing interest rates is an uncertainty that can
have an adverse effect on net income.
In
adjusting the Company’s asset/liability position, the Board and management
attempt to manage the Company’s interest rate risk while minimizing net interest
margin compression. At times, depending on the level of general
interest rates, the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates,
market conditions and competitive factors, the Board and management may
determine to increase the Company’s interest rate risk position somewhat in
order to increase its net interest margin. The Company’s results of
operations and net portfolio values remain vulnerable to changes in interest
rates and fluctuations in the difference between long- and short-term interest
rates.
The
primary tool utilized by ALCO to manage interest rate risk is a balance
sheet/income statement simulation model (interest rate sensitivity
analysis). Information such as principal balance, interest rate,
maturity date, cash flows, next repricing date (if needed), and current rates is
uploaded into the model to create an ending balance sheet. In
addition, ALCO makes certain assumptions regarding prepayment speeds for loans
and leases and mortgage related investment securities along with any optionality
within the deposits and borrowings.
The model
is first run under an assumption of a flat rate scenario (i.e. no change in
current interest rates) with a static balance sheet over a 12-month
period. Two additional models are run with static balance sheets: (1)
a gradual increase of 200 bp, (2) and a gradual decrease of 200 bp taking place
over a 12-month period with a static balance sheet. Under these scenarios,
assets subject to prepayments are adjusted to account for faster or slower
prepayment assumptions. Any investment securities or borrowings that
have callable options embedded into them are handled accordingly based on the
interest rate scenario. The resultant changes in net interest income are then
measured against the flat rate scenario.
In the
declining rate scenario, net interest income is projected to decrease when
compared to the forecasted net interest income in the flat rate scenario through
the simulation period. The decrease in net interest income is a result of
earning assets repricing downward at a faster rate than interest bearing
liabilities. The inability to effectively lower deposit rates will likely reduce
or eliminate the benefit of lower interest rates. In the rising rate scenarios,
net interest income is projected to experience a decline from the flat rate
scenario. Net interest income is projected to remain at lower levels than in a
flat rate scenario through the simulation period primarily due to a lag in
assets repricing while funding costs increase. The potential impact on earnings
is dependent on the ability to lag deposit repricing. If short-term rates
continue to increase, the Company expects competitive pressures will likely lead
to core deposit pricing increases, which will likely continue compression of the
net interest margin.
Net
interest income for the next 12 months in the + 200/- 200 bp scenarios, as
described above, is within the internal policy risk limits of not more than a
7.5% change in net interest income. The following table summarizes the
percentage change in net interest income in the rising and declining rate
scenarios over a 12-month period from the forecasted net interest income in the
flat rate scenario using the March 31, 2008 balance sheet position:
Table
8
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Analysis
|
|
Change
in interest rates
|
Percent
change in
|
(in bp points)
|
net interest income
|
+200
|
(4.54%)
|
-200
|
(0.82%)
|
The
Company has taken several measures to mitigate net interest margin compression.
The Company originates 15-year, 20-year and 30-year residential real estate
mortgages with the intent to sell. Over time, the Company has shortened the
average life of its investment securities portfolio by limiting purchases of
mortgage-backed securities and redirecting proceeds into short-duration CMOs and
US Agency notes and bonds. Lastly, the Company will continue to focus on growing
noninterest bearing demand deposits and prudently managing deposit
costs.
Liquidity
Risk
Liquidity
involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of customers who may be
depositors wanting to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that
sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs. The ALCO is
responsible for liquidity management and has developed guidelines which cover
all assets and liabilities, as well as off balance sheet items that are
potential sources or uses of liquidity. Liquidity policies must also provide the
flexibility to implement appropriate strategies and tactical actions.
Requirements change as loans and leases grow, deposits and securities mature,
and payments on borrowings are made. Liquidity management includes a focus on
interest rate sensitivity management with a goal of avoiding widely fluctuating
net interest margins through periods of changing economic
conditions.
The
primary liquidity measurement the Company utilizes is called the Basic Surplus,
which captures the adequacy of its access to reliable sources of cash relative
to the stability of its funding mix of average liabilities. This approach
recognizes the importance of balancing levels of cash flow liquidity from short-
and long-term securities with the availability of dependable borrowing sources
which can be accessed when necessary. At March 31, 2008, the Company’s Basic
Surplus measurement was 5.3% of total assets or $278 million, which was above
the Company’s minimum of 5% or $261 million set forth in its liquidity
policies.
This
Basic Surplus approach enables the Company to adequately manage liquidity from
both operational and contingency perspectives. By tempering the need for cash
flow liquidity with reliable borrowing facilities, the Company is able to
operate with a more fully invested and, therefore, higher interest income
generating, securities portfolio. The makeup and term structure of the
securities portfolio is, in part, impacted by the overall interest rate
sensitivity of the balance sheet. Investment decisions and deposit pricing
strategies are impacted by the liquidity position. At March 31, 2008,
the Company Basic Surplus declined compared to the December 31, 2007 Basic
Surplus of 7.3%.
The
Company’s primary source of funds is from its subsidiary, NBT Bank. Certain
restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Company’s subsidiary bank to
transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends. The approval of the
Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is required to pay dividends when a
bank fails to meet certain minimum regulatory capital standards or when such
dividends are in excess of a subsidiary bank’s earnings retained in the current
year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years (as defined in the
regulations). At March 31, 2008, approximately $28.6 million of the total
stockholders’ equity of NBT Bank was available for payment of dividends to the
Company without approval by the OCC. NBT Bank’s ability to pay dividends also is
subject to the Bank being in compliance with regulatory capital requirements.
NBT Bank is currently in compliance with these requirements. Under the State of
Delaware Business Corporation Law, the Company may declare and pay dividends
either out of accumulated net retained earnings or capital surplus.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About
Market Risk
Information
called for by Item 3 is contained in the Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity
Management section of the Management Discussion and Analysis.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company's management, including
the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation
of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of March 31, 2008. Based upon that evaluation,
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the evaluation date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were
effective in timely alerting them to any material information relating to the
Company and its subsidiaries required to be included in the Company's periodic
SEC filings.
There were no
changes made in the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most
recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
There are
no material legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental
to business to which the Company is a party or of which any of its property is
subject.
Management
of the Company does not believe there have been any material changes in the risk
factors that were disclosed in the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008.
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
(c)
|
The
table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by
the Company (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934), of our common stock during the quarter ended March 31,
2008:
|
Period
|
|
Total Number of Shares
Purchased
|
|
|
Average Price Paid Per
Share
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans
|
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased
Under The Plans (1)
|
|
1/1/08 - 1/31/08
|
|
|
60,488 |
|
|
$ |
21.67 |
|
|
|
60,488 |
|
|
|
1,415,392 |
|
2/1/08 - 2/28/08
|
|
|
200,602 |
|
|
|
21.96 |
|
|
|
200,602 |
|
|
|
1,214,790 |
|
3/1/08 - 3/31/08
|
|
|
11,750 |
|
|
|
18.94 |
|
|
|
11,750 |
|
|
|
1,203,040 |
|
Total
|
|
|
272,840 |
|
|
$ |
21.77 |
|
|
|
272,840 |
|
|
|
1,203,040 |
|
|
1.
|
Under
a previously disclosed stock repurchase plan authorized on July 23, 2007
in the amount of 1,000,000 shares, the Company purchased 272,840 shares of
its common stock during the three month period ended March 31, 2008, for a
total of $5.9 million at an average price of $21.77 per
share. At March 31, 2008, there were 1,203,040 shares available
for repurchase under previously announced plans. There were
203,040 shares available for repurchase under the stock repurchase plan
authorized on July 23, 2007, in the amount of 1,000,000
shares. This plan expires on December 31,
2008. There were 1,000,000 shares available for repurchase
under the stock repurchase plan authorized on January 28, 2008, in the
amount of 1,000,000 shares. This plan expires on December 31,
2009.
|
Item 3 –
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 –
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
None
3.1 Certificate
of Incorporation of NBT Bancorp Inc. as amended through July 23, 2001 (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
filed on March 29, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2 By-laws
of NBT Bancorp Inc. as amended and restated through July 23, 2001 (filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
filed on March 29, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3 Rights
Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2004, between NBT Bancorp Inc. and Registrar
and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Form
8-K, file number 0-14703, filed on November 18, 2004, and incorporated by
reference herein).
3.4 Certificate
of Designation of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as
Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration's Form 8-K, file Number 0-14703,
filed on November 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1 Specimen
common stock certificate for NBT's common stock (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant's Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on
December 27, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized, this 12th day of May 2008.
|
NBT
BANCORP INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael J. Chewens
|
|
|
Michael
J. Chewens, CPA
|
|
|
Senior
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
|
|
3.1 Certificate
of Incorporation of NBT Bancorp Inc. as amended through July 23, 2001 (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
filed on March 29, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2 By-laws
of NBT Bancorp Inc. as amended and restated through July 23, 2001 (filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
filed on March 29, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3 Rights
Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2004, between NBT Bancorp Inc. and Registrar
and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Form
8-K, file number 0-14703, filed on November 18, 2004, and incorporated by
reference herein).
3.4 Certificate
of Designation of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as
Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration's Form 8-K, file Number 0-14703,
filed on November 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1 Specimen
common stock certificate for NBT's common stock (filed as exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant's Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on
December 27, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
36
ex31_1.htm
EXHIBIT
31.1
CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, Martin
A. Dietrich, certify that:
1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NBT Bancorp
Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this
quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e))
and internal control over
financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the
registrant and we have:
a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant's other certifying
officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or
persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operations of internal controls which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.
Date: May
12, 2008
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Martin A. Dietrich
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
ex31_2.htm
EXHIBIT
31.2
CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I,
Michael J. Chewens, certify that:
1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NBT Bancorp
Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this
quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant's other certifying
officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operations of internal controls which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.
Date: May
12, 2008
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael J. Chewens
|
|
|
Senior
Executive Vice President,
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and
|
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
ex32_1.htm
EXHIBIT
32.1
Written
Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of NBT Bancorp Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:
(a) the
Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2008, filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b) information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Martin A. Dietrich
|
|
|
Martin
A. Dietrich
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
May
12, 2008
|
A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided
to NBT Bancorp Inc. and will be
retained by NBT Bancorp Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
ex32_2.htm
EXHIBIT
32.2
Written
Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of NBT Bancorp Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:
(a) the Form
10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,
2008, filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
(b) information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/
Michael J. Chewens
|
|
|
Michael J. Chewens
|
|
Senior
Executive Vice President Chief
|
|
Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary
|
|
May
12, 2008
|
A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to NBT Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by
NBT Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.